June 2026 Levy Mining Update: Another Swing and a Miss

June 2026 Levy Mining Update: Another Swing and a Miss

On June 23, 2026, The Springfield Township Planning Commission received another monthly update on the Levy/BMC mining application for the proposed Ormond Road sand and gravel mine. Unfortunately, this update missed the mark. Again.

According to the June 15 update from Carlisle/Wortman, there have been no meetings between Township officials or consultants and the applicant since the last update. The memo also states that exploratory well drilling may occur in July, but that schedule is subject to change. So, even the one listed activity is a maybe.

The update also notes that Springfield Township received a Freedom of Information Act request from Levy/Burroughs on May 22, 2026, requesting documents and communications related to the application. Oko Environmental obtained Levy/Burroughs’ FOIA request and has made it available to the public on the Timeline: The Ormond Road Mine Proposal page.

But here is what the update did not include:

There was no information about when Levy/Burroughs would be resubmitting materials to address the deficiencies (that were identified more than a year ago) in its application. There was no fact-finding committee update. There was no information about the exploratory well that has already been drilled. There was no update on the aquifer drawdown test. There was no update on the effort to reclassify Ormond Road. There was no new technical review, no consultant findings, and no clear timeline for when the application may return to the Planning Commission for meaningful review.

And perhaps most disappointing: the Planning Commission members did not ask any questions.


The memo itself ended by inviting questions and asking how the monthly update could be improved. That was an opening. A very clear one. But instead of asking about the missing information, the application deficiencies, the well drilling, Ormond Road, the fact-finding process, or the next steps, the update passed without meaningful discussion.

Monthly updates are supposed to help the public and the planning commission members understand what is happening. But this latest update mostly confirms what residents already know: there are still major unanswered questions, and very little substantive information is being provided publicly.

Those unanswered questions include groundwater impacts, private well concerns, wetland impacts, haul route safety, Ormond Road upgrades, application deficiencies, and whether the proposed mining operation can meet the Township’s standards for Special Land Use approval.

At this point, the public does not need another “nothing to report” wrapped up as an update. Residents need clear answers, current documentation, and a transparent explanation of what the Township has received, what it is still waiting for, and what happens next.

For now, the Levy application still appears to be paused.

And the public is still waiting.

3 thoughts on “June 2026 Levy Mining Update: Another Swing and a Miss
  • Ken Bates June 27, 2026 at 12:11 am

    Thanks for the update. Are they stall UNTIL Ric
    shows up?

    • Kara June 27, 2026 at 1:48 pm

      Because Supervisor Davis does not sit on the Planning Commission, there is no reason for them to not push Levy for information. As someone who has been a part of this process, I expect no one in the Planning Commission is talking with Levy under Ric’s direction. The Scope of Work document drafted by the Supervisor specifically states that the Supervisor is the main contact and conduit for everything, even though Davis has repeatedly said he does not want to influence the process or the Planning Commission. After the last Township Board meeting and now this meeting, it appears several members of both boards are apprehensive to do anything without the Supervisors constant involvement and approval. It appears they have difficulty working outside the micromanaged workplace that Davis has created. In the end, even if/when Davis returns, the Planning Commission still has to do their job and get answers from Levy & Carlisle Wortman. So their ‘stalling’ is from lack of communication & education about the process, poor direction from leadership, and perhaps a bit of fear of Davis’ propensity for retaliation.

      • Joey G June 27, 2026 at 2:14 pm

        Exactly. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

*
*